top of page

Profoundly Dumb Profundity: How Bad Rulebook Hygiene Became 'The Universe is Under No Obligation to Make Sense'

Sep 14
3 min read

Why Banach–Tarski Isn't a Paradox, It's a Catagory Error.



Imagine two board game players, each dedicated to a different board game. One plays Monopoly; the other plays Risk. Both games work well on their own. Each has a written rulebook, and each rests on a set of common-sense, unstated assumptions about the world the game inhabits.


  1. In Monopoly, the board has fixed boundaries, cash must balance, and houses are finite physical tokens. The core assumption is conservation: you cannot trade property that does not exist, and pieces do not clone themselves.

  2. In Risk, the board is an abstract theater of global conquest. To keep high-level strategic coordination moving across large maps, the rulebook grants players broad structural allowances: you can draft armies, distribute resources across sprawling fronts, and coordinate actions across disparate territories without having to manually account for the individual physical transit of every soldier.


Now imagine a few Monopoly players take on some overly ambitious goals not described in their rulebook. Lets say they want to extend their financial strategies to handle continuous rents, compounding interest, and infinite portfolios. Looking across the hall at colleagues playing Risk, they notice an extraordinarily efficient mechanic derived from their rulebook: the ability to execute simultaneous selections across any collection of assets without having to specify an operational sequence to carry it out.


Thinking it is an innocent operational upgrade, the Monopoly committee decided to copy a rule from the Risk rulebook and paste it directly into their Monopoly manual. It worked, the imported mechanic allows the Monopoly players to revisit their infinite portfolio ideas.


Unfortunately, what they failed to notice was the hidden binding unstated axiom hidden somewhere on the bottom of the page. The imported rule was axiomatically wedded and not amount of Ctrl-V could prevent that.


It wasn't long after the revised rulebook hit the shelf that Monopoly players began to notice some inconsistencies. Some players read the newly imported rule and began testing its logical limits and pointing out the absurd implications of adopting it. Other players embraced or even exploited the new rule for competitive loopholes.


Using the new selection mechanic, these players partitioned the coordinates of Boardwalk into five non-measurable, dust-like clouds of points. Then, using legal board shifts embedded into the rulebook they reassemble those five point clouds into two fully identical Boardwalks and started doubling the rent.


When other players protested, they would simply call over the referee, point to the rulebook, and ask which of their moves were illegal?

 

This exploit technique took on a life of its own, it was even given the Banach and Tarski Boardwalk Cloning Technique and was considered the strategy of S-tier players.

 

After decades bogus duplication winning a Monopoly-Risk committee had to be formed to address the supposed glitch. Now, you would thing that any sane committee would have looked at the duplicated property, recognized the syntax error, and struck the imported rule from the book. But the committee had already invested heavily in the new system. So instead of admitting an incompatibility between two different games, the committee made a stunning rhetorical pivot:


"The rule stays. The cloned Boardwalk is perfectly legal. In fact, if your low-level intuition tells you that real estate property cannot spontaneously decompose into five point clouds in order to double than you are stuck in primitive mathematics.


Over the decades that followed, the story took on a life of its own. Spectators gathered around the table not to play Monopoly but to marvel at the holy mystery of the self-replicating Boardwalk. Tomes were penned about the profound, paradox-ridden nature of the Monopoly Board and how it gave quintessential insight into the paradoxes of the natural world.

 

The duplication glitch itself inspired generations of thinking-adjacent coffee shop philosophers to speculate on how real reality really isn't

 

This is why we practice rulebook hygiene!

 


 
 
 

Comments


The Science & 

Mathematics University

© 2023 by Scientist Personal. Proudly created with Wix.com

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Clean Grey
  • LinkedIn Clean Grey
bottom of page